Negation Of Negation
Are you curious about how change really happens in society? Marxist philosophy offers a fascinating way to look at social development through the concept of the “Negation of the Negation.” This idea suggests that progress isn’t a straightforward path but a dynamic process involving contradictions and transformations. By understanding how opposing forces interact and give rise to something new, we can better grasp the forces that shape our world today. Dive into this exploration of dialectical materialism to see how history is shaped by struggle, conflict, and the emergence of new possibilities.
The third law of materialist dialectics is called the “Negation of the Negation.” This idea is a key part of Marxist philosophy, showing how development happens through a series of contradictions—like opposing forces that interact—which eventually lead to new, higher forms of society. For example, the conflicts between social classes can create conditions for social transformation, leading to a new kind of society. Instead of seeing progress as a simple, straight path, this approach sees it as a back-and-forth movement, where the old is replaced by the new in a complex process.
Understanding the Negation of the Negation
The concept of the negation of the negation originally comes from Hegel, but Marx and Engels adapted it to fit their materialist way of thinking. In simple terms, dialectics is a way of understanding change as a struggle between opposites. First, there is an initial situation (called the thesis). This thesis is then challenged by something that opposes it (the antithesis). For example, imagine a society that relies on traditional farming methods (thesis). People start demanding more efficient production, which leads to the development of industrial farming techniques (antithesis). From this clash, a new approach might emerge (the synthesis), which combines aspects of traditional methods, like sustainability, with new technology to improve productivity. This process of thesis, antithesis, and synthesis keeps repeating, creating cycles of change, where each synthesis eventually becomes a new thesis that will face its own negation. This process keeps repeating, creating cycles of change, where each synthesis eventually becomes a new thesis that will face its own negation.
To explain this, Engels gives the example of a grain of barley in his book “Anti-Dühring.” The grain (thesis) is planted in the soil, where it grows but is also destroyed in its original form (negated). However, from this destruction, a new plant grows, which eventually produces many grains of barley (a new synthesis, the negation of the negation). So, the original grain isn’t just destroyed; it’s transformed into something better, showing how change involves both breaking down and building up.
This process helps us understand how change works in a dialectical way. It’s not just about destroying something old but about transforming it into something new and better. We can see this in both nature and society—development means overcoming the old while keeping and improving on some of its useful aspects. Dialectics, therefore, shows us that progress is not a simple, one-way journey but a series of steps that build on each other, each stage both influenced by the past and laying the foundation for the future.
Marx applied this idea to his analysis of social change, especially in the development of different social systems. For example, the Roman slave society was eventually replaced (negated) when it collapsed, giving rise to feudal society. Feudalism also had contradictions that led to its own negation—the rise of capitalism. This transformation wasn’t linear or predetermined; instead, it was shaped by the conflicts and contradictions within each system. In the feudal system, the rigid class structures created tensions, eventually allowing a new social class, the bourgeoisie, to challenge the old order, leading to revolutionary changes.
The Role of Contradiction
A central idea in the negation of the negation is the role of contradiction. In dialectics, contradictions are not just accidents or problems that happen to a system; they are part of the system itself. Every stage of development has contradictions that eventually lead to its own negation. In other words, change happens because of the tensions and conflicts between different parts of a system.
Take the example of private property under capitalism. Capitalism replaced the feudal system by creating a new kind of economy based on private property and wage labor. This shift involved taking land away from peasants (enclosure) and turning it into private property, which created a new kind of economic organization. However, capitalism itself has contradictions—like the growing gap between the rich and the poor—that make it unstable and set the stage for revolutionary changes that could replace it with a new social system, like socialism.
Marx talks about this in “Capital, Volume I” when he describes the process of primitive accumulation. Primitive accumulation was a historical process where pre-capitalist ways of life were destroyed, and the conditions for capitalism were created. This happened mainly by taking land from peasants, such as through the Enclosure Acts in England, which forced many people off common lands and into wage labor, creating a working class that had no choice but to sell their labor. The contradictions within capitalism—like the conflict between the workers, who produce wealth, and the capitalists, who own and profit from it—eventually become too intense, leading to a need for change.
These contradictions show up in different ways: economic crises, overproduction, unemployment, and the gap between what society produces and how the benefits are distributed. These problems aren’t just mistakes; they are part of how capitalism works. The same system that creates wealth also creates inequality and crises. Over time, the working class becomes more aware of its collective power and the unfair nature of the system, which sets the stage for change—negating capitalism and moving towards socialism.
Overcoming Simplistic Views of Negation
The negation of the negation isn’t just a simple cycle of overcoming and transforming. It’s a complex process that involves both preserving and improving what came before. In Marxist theory, socialism isn’t just going back to an earlier kind of society like primitive communism. Instead, it’s a more advanced system that solves the problems of capitalism while keeping the progress that was made under capitalism, like increased productivity and technological advances.
Engels also talks about how nature follows these dialectical laws in his work “Dialectics of Nature.” He explains that growth and decay in nature lead to new forms, which are qualitatively different from what came before. This idea reflects the spiral character of dialectical development, where each stage builds on the previous one but at a higher level. This spiral metaphor helps us understand that history, while sometimes repeating similar patterns, does so in a more developed and advanced way, integrating lessons and contradictions from previous stages.
For example, the transition from capitalism to socialism isn’t just about undoing capitalism. Instead, it’s about moving forward to a society that builds on what capitalism developed—like technology and productivity—but without the exploitation. The negation of the negation, in this sense, means rejecting the negative aspects of the old system while using its positive contributions to create something better. Socialism aims to transform private ownership into collective ownership, keeping the productive power of capitalism but using it for the benefit of everyone.
Critiques and Contemporary Relevance
Some critics, including post-structuralists and analytical Marxists, think the idea of the negation of the negation is too deterministic. They argue that it risks oversimplifying social changes by treating them like mechanical laws. They warn against seeing historical progress as inevitable or pre-planned by dialectical logic. However, Marx and Engels never suggested that history unfolds in a rigid, predetermined way. Instead, they saw the negation of the negation as a tendency in how social changes happen—a useful way to understand the possible direction of social transformations based on material conditions and class struggles.
In today’s world, the idea of the negation of the negation still helps us understand movements against capitalist systems. This is especially true in places like the Global South or in emerging alternative economic systems like those promoted by BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa). For example, BRICS nations have created their own development banks to challenge Western financial dominance and promote regional economic independence. These movements try to create alternatives to the current capitalist model by challenging existing power structures and promoting economic cooperation that isn’t controlled by Western capitalist interests. For example, BRICS nations have created their own development banks and trade agreements to balance out Western financial institutions like the IMF and World Bank. These efforts can be seen as potential negations of the global capitalist order, each one offering new possibilities for social relations that focus on cooperation and local development. However, whether these efforts succeed depends on the balance of class forces, economic independence, and other historical factors.
We can also see the negation of the negation in the rise of cooperative economic models, the focus on sustainability, and the push for social welfare in many parts of the world. These efforts represent attempts to move beyond the contradictions of neoliberal capitalism, which has led to economic inequality, environmental damage, and social disconnection. The growth of worker cooperatives, community land trusts, and other forms of collective ownership is an effort to replace capitalist production with something fairer and more sustainable.
The COVID-19 pandemic has also highlighted the contradictions of global capitalism, showing the weaknesses in supply chains, the problems with privatized healthcare, and deep inequalities between and within nations. In response, there have been calls for better public health systems, fairer distribution of resources, and a rethinking of global economic dependencies. These responses are part of the dialectical process of negation—challenging the existing capitalist system and suggesting a new synthesis that focuses on human well-being rather than profit.
Conclusion
The third law of materialist dialectics, the negation of the negation, helps us understand how social development is dynamic and constantly changing. It’s not a simple or mechanical process but a complex and contradictory one that leads to new forms of society. By looking at how each stage of history is both negated and built upon, Marxist theory gives us a powerful way to understand the inevitability of social transformation based on material conditions.
This concept encourages us to look deeper into social structures, seeing not just what exists but also the seeds of its transformation. It is through this dialectical movement—the ongoing process of negation and development—that society can move towards true change. Progress, according to this theory, is not a straight path but a winding journey, full of conflicts and leaps forward, ultimately aiming to create a more just and equitable world.
#Marxism #Dialectics #SocialChange #NegationOfNegation #Capitalism #Socialism #DialecticalMaterialism #Hegel #Engels #Marx
References:
- Engels, Friedrich. Anti-Dühring. Progress Publishers, 1978.
- Marx, Karl. Capital, Volume I. Penguin Classics, 1990.
- Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. The Science of Logic. Cambridge University Press, 2010.
- Engels, Friedrich. Dialectics of Nature. International Publishers, 1940.
- Lenin, Vladimir. The State and Revolution. Penguin Classics, 1992.